- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Well good evening my fellow FiOS kittehs 🙂
I recently upgraded from 35/35 to 150/65 and today the VZ tech came to my house....My house was already pre-wired for FiOS when I purchased it four years ago....Thank You Baby JeeBus 😛
Also my house is all ethernet and the tech removed my old DPON unit and put in a new GPON unit also he installed the new Actiontec Wireless N Router the red one with two antennae on it....I am using ethernet and my speedtests are 75 - 95 down and 40 - 50 up.....I am like **bleep**??!! I have a gig nic in my PC and for the love of God I cannot figure out why I am not getting the speeds at least somewhere in the ball park of say like 100ish down....Hmmmm....My NIC is Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller with the latest drivers as of today (4/2012)....So I am stuck guys any suggestions to help me out??!!
Thanks.....
FYI --> I live in the Washington, DC Metro Area
Solved! Go to Correct Answer
Correct answers
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- make sure your hardwired when testing
- test @ http://speedtest.verizon.com/fios300/
- After it's done, click on analysis and copy and paste those results here.
you may need to optimize the PC you can do that @ www2.verizon.net/help/fios_settings/optimizer/
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- make sure your hardwired when testing
- test @ http://speedtest.verizon.com/fios300/
- After it's done, click on analysis and copy and paste those results here.
you may need to optimize the PC you can do that @ www2.verizon.net/help/fios_settings/optimizer/
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
HOLY FISHSTICKS BATMAN!!!!! Check this out below please:
Analysis information:
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
SendBufferSize set to [261360]
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 77.26Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 153.25Mb/s
------ Client System Details ------
OS data: Name = Windows 7, Architecture = x86, Version = 6.1
Java data: Vendor = Oracle Corporation, Version = 1.7.0_05
------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------
Client Receive Window detected at 261360 bytes.
100 Mbps FastEthernet link found.
Link set to Full Duplex mode
No network congestion discovered.
Good network cable(s) found
Normal duplex operation found.
Web100 reports the Round trip time = 12.2 msec; the Packet size = 1452 Bytes; and
No packet loss - but packets arrived out-of-order 0.11% of the time
This connection is receiver limited 3.81% of the time.
This connection is sender limited 95.78% of the time.
Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:
RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON
RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON
RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF
RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF
RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON
Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable
Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address
Server says [***.**.***.173 {edited for privacy}] but Client says [192.168.1.2]
Why does this differ from SpeedTest and SpeakEasy? I am confused by this and thank you for the information 🙂
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Glad that helped.
one of the vz specialists has noted the following in various forum posts
the current production Ookla client that the public speedtest.net servers use cannot handle the uploads from FiOS. The new Ookla client software that Verizon is using has been tested to beyond 100Mb uploads....
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I had the 150/65 package installed. I am getting around the advertised speeds at the verizon speedtest site
On my laptop I am getting 47 down and 44 up over wifi. I have the new red router with 2 antennas. I understand there is a reduction when using wifi but is this normal. I am happy with the upgrade so far. I had 35/35 before and these speeds are much faster.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Just to clarify I got 152/68 wired at the Fios speedtest site.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Your computer probably has a G wifi card which only will top out at 54mb, if you have an N, and the right router, you should get 130 is download speed, the rev G is the right router for the service because it is dual band N, the REV i which you top out at 130mb, even tho I heard it might be 160mb, but never saw it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I am not getting that level of detailed results when I test, there is no "Analysis" button on my results page.
Perhaps I am not Quantum (or not yet) !!
nycplayboy78 wrote:
HOLY FISHSTICKS BATMAN!!!!! Check this out below please:
Analysis information:
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
SendBufferSize set to [261360]
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 77.26Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 153.25Mb/s
------ Client System Details ------
OS data: Name = Windows 7, Architecture = x86, Version = 6.1
Java data: Vendor = Oracle Corporation, Version = 1.7.0_05
------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------
Client Receive Window detected at 261360 bytes.
100 Mbps FastEthernet link found.
Link set to Full Duplex mode
No network congestion discovered.
Good network cable(s) found
Normal duplex operation found.
Web100 reports the Round trip time = 12.2 msec; the Packet size = 1452 Bytes; and
No packet loss - but packets arrived out-of-order 0.11% of the time
This connection is receiver limited 3.81% of the time.
This connection is sender limited 95.78% of the time.
Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to:
RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON
RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON
RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF
RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF
RFC 1323 Window Scaling: ON
Information: Network Middlebox is modifying MSS variable
Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End
Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address
Server says [***.**.***.173 {edited for privacy}] but Client says [192.168.1.2]Why does this differ from SpeedTest and SpeakEasy? I am confused by this and thank you for the information 🙂
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
looks like it doesn't say analysis anymore, but it looks like this
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I am not seeing the same screen or test, perhaps my region/state is to blame. Clicking the shown link for the "standard" test promising more details returns me right back to the same test and URL.
Hubrisnxs wrote:
looks like it doesn't say analysis anymore, but it looks like this