Only been out since November. And right now is only carried in select areas by a few providers.
Plus, most of their programming (with maybe the exception of anything new) is not going to be in HD.
So why not get a channel that has more HD content first?
I agree with the above comment -- Verizon desparately needs more HD content, but adding a channel that mostly plays low-def stuff is a waste, and we already have six .tv channels doing that. Focus on the demanded channels that DO have HD programming first!
I disagree with the low-def comments. Even shows that were NOT shot in HD will look better if broadcast properly. And besides, I watch TVLAND in the evening for its newer prime time shows. They're very good and filmed in HD. It tickes me off that I have to watch 3-4 hrs/week of my favorite HD shows in crummy SD.
There's enough bandwith to distribute TVLAND in HD as well as any other channels you want. Why limit it?
I agree with jhajin as I am forced to watch brand new shows fimed in HD in standard def.
Regarding all the old SD content,these SD shows looks much better on an HD channel.
I just switched from cable and was very disappointed to find out FIOS did not have TV Land or TCM HD.
Cable has both in HD.
TV Land a has a lot of HD programming in the evening. In addition to new shows, Everybody Loves Raymond and King of Queens are in HD.
I'm not so certain I made the right choice to switch from cable.
You must be a registered user to add a comment here. If you've already registered, please log in. If you haven't registered yet, please register and log in.